YOUR
Search

    05.05.2020

    CRIMINAL LAW | Coronavirus: administrative and criminal sanctions and impact of legislative measures on criminal proceedings


    The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize and clarify - on the basis of the recent legislative measures - on the one hand the possible consequences deriving from the breach of the containment measures introduced by the Government to stem the epidemiological phenomenon caused by the COVID-19 virus, and on the other hand the impact that this emergency legislation necessarily has (and will have) on criminal proceedings.

     

    We will provide a general outline both on the current framework of criminal and administrative sanctions to ensure compliance with the provisions adopted, and on the measures, in the field of justice, to ensure compliance with procedural deadlines and proper holding of hearings.

    1. The current framework of sanctions

    Article 4 of Decree Law No. 19 of 25 March 2020 - specifically entitled “Sanctions and controls” - provides for administrative and criminal sanctions against those who are responsible for breaches of the containment measures, which have been recently updated by the D.P.C.M. (Decree of the President of the Council of Ministers) of 26 April 2020.

     

    It is necessary to make a first distinction depending on whether or not the offender is a subject already recognized as positive to COVID-19:

    • any person who has not tested positive for COVID-19 and who breaches one of the numerous containment measures provided for in the legislation, shall be subject to the following administrative sanctions, unless the incident constitutes an offence:
      • Administrative pecuniary sanction from €400.00 to €3,000.00

    The aforementioned sanction will be increased by up to 1/3 in the case of breaches committed using a vehicle. The fine will be reduced by 30% if payment is made within 5 days of notification or service taking place. Moreover, the fine will be doubled in case of repeated violations.

    • any person who has already tested positive for COVID-19 and who breaches “the absolute prohibition to leave one’s home or residence imposed on people under quarantine because they have tested positive for the virus” commits the following criminal offences:
      • Article 452, paragraph 2, No. 2 of the Italian Criminal Code: “Culpable crimes against public health”; a type of offence punished with imprisonment from 1 to 5 years for anyone who commits, by negligence, any of the offences provided for by Articles 438 and 439 of the Italian Criminal Code, including the offence of causing an epidemic.

    In the alternative:

      • Article 260, Royal Decree No. 1265 of 27 July 1934: “Anyone who fails to observe a legal order issued to prevent the invasion or spread of an infectious human disease is punished with imprisonment from 3 to 18 months and a fine from €500 to €5,000”. For the specific circumstances, said criminal offence has been amended by Article 4, paragraph 7, of the abovementioned decree.

    In addition, the various emergency measures, besides providing for containment measures and related sanctions against natural persons, have, as is well known, placed restrictions on certain activities.

    This line has been followed, with some flexibility, also by the most recent measure dated 26 April 2020, which still maintains the accessory administrative sanction of the closure of business or activity from 5 to 30 days - already contemplated by Decree Law No. 19 of 25 March 2020 - for those failing to comply with the measures. The sanction in question can also be applied provisionally, when finding the violation, for a period not exceeding 5 days, which will be subsequently deducted from the administrative sanction finally imposed. In case of multiple violations, the sanction at issue will be applied to the maximum extent.

    With regard to the measures most recently adopted, the D.P.C.M. of 26 April 2020 essentially remained along the lines of the previous legislation.

    Indeed, to date, cinemas, theatres, amusement arcades, bingo halls, discos and similar establishments continue to remain closed; nothing has changed also for gyms, sports centres, swimming pools, wellness and spa centres, schools, kindergartens and ski resorts. Banking, financial and insurance services are guaranteed at all times, subject to compliance with health and hygiene regulations.

     

    With regard to retail trade, meaning both small shops and medium and large scale retailers, the latest decree has listed once again in the specific “Annex 1” the activities considered as essential and thus not subject to suspension, which almost entirely coincide with those indicated in the previous measures. Commercial establishments included in the list are, however, required to ensure distancing, regulated entry and to reduce dwell times to a minimum.

     

    On the other hand, there are some novelties in the catering sector, where in addition to home delivery - already permitted by law - take-away catering will be allowed, subject, of course, to compliance with hygiene and health regulations and maintaining a social distance of one metre, in addition to the prohibition of consumption inside and lingering outside the premises.

     

    Finally, with particular regard to production and commercial activities, Article 2 of the new measure refers to its Annex No. 3 for a list of all activities exempt from the general obligation of suspension on the entire national territory. Nonetheless, said activities are required to comply with the various “anti – COVID” protocols signed and attached to the measure, under penalty of suspension of the activity until safety conditions are restored. Suspended activities may still be organized through remote and agile working. It is important to point out that activities that are about to reopen on 4 May may carry out all pre-reopening requirements already from 27 April.

     

    With regard to professional activities, Article 1, paragraph 1, letter ii), of the D.P.C.M. of 26 April 2020, following exactly what was stated in the previous legislation, has recommended that:

     

    a) the maximum use of agile working methods be implemented for activities that can be carried out at home or at a distance;

     

    b) paid holidays and paid leave for employees as well as the other instruments provided for by collective bargaining agreements be encouraged;

     

    c) anti-infection safety protocols be put in place and, where it is not possible to respect the interpersonal distance of one metre as the main containment measure, individual protection devices be adopted;

     

    d) workplace sanitation be encouraged, also using forms of social shock absorbers for this purpose.

     

    So, there is no suspension in professional activities, but simple recommendations aimed at avoiding risks of infection.

    2. Inter – temporal law profiles

    Before the entry into force of Legislative Decree No. 19 of 25 March 2020, those who failed to comply with the Authority’s measures by breaching the restrictions were punishable, without distinction, according to Article 650 of the Italian Criminal Code, with imprisonment for up to three months or a fine of up to €206.00. This was without prejudice to the accessory administrative sanction for economic activities. The issuance of the abovementioned measure has introduced the “decriminalization” of the breach of containment measures, except in the case of persons who have tested positive for the virus and breached quarantine, now subject to the criminal sanctions indicated above; indeed, Article 4, paragraph 1, of the aforementioned decree provides that Article 650 of the Italian Criminal Code is not applicable in such case and that the administrative sanctions already outlined in the previous paragraph shall apply. Consequently, the following conclusions can be drawn:

    • For infringements detected before the entry into force of Decree Law No. 19 of 25 March 2020: Administrative pecuniary sanction of €200, pursuant to Article 4, paragraph 8, which provides for the application of the current minimum administrative sanction reduced by half. The incident does not constitute an offence under Article 650 of the Italian Criminal Code.
    • Infringements detected after the entry into force of the Decree: Administrative and criminal sanctions provided for by paragraph 2.

    3. Measures in the justice field

    Due to the rapid succession of emergency regulations, it is necessary to clarify which are the current rules on compliance with procedural deadlines and postponement/holding of hearings in criminal matters.

    Procedural deadlines:

    • Article 36 of Decree Law No. 23 of 8 April 2020 extended the suspension of deadlines for any actions until 11 May 2020, by intervening on Article 83, paragraphs 1 and 2, of Decree Law No. 18 of 17 March 2020, which provided for suspension until 15 April 2020.
    • Therefore, all deadlines concerning: preliminary investigations, adoption of judicial measures and filing of the relevant reasons, appeals and procedural deadlines in general are to be considered suspended.
    • If a deadline starts running during the suspension period, the starting period shall be postponed to the end of the suspension period. Conversely, if the deadline is counted backwards and falls in whole or in part in the suspension period, the hearing or action from which the deadline begins shall be postponed so that the deadline is respected.

    Postponement of hearings:

    • Article 36 of Decree Law No. 23 of 8 April 2020 has also provided for the automatic postponement of civil and criminal hearings to a date following 11 May 2020, a deadline that has been extended too with respect to the initial one of 15 April 2020.

    Exceptions to the suspension of deadlines and postponement of hearings:

    • The suspension of procedural deadlines and the rules governing the automatic postponement of hearings SHALL NOT APPLY to proceedings:
      • for the confirmation of arrest or detention;
      • in which the deadlines referred to in Article 304 of the Italian Code of Criminal Procedure expire during the period of suspension;
      • in which custodial security measures have been applied or requested.
    • It will also be possible, at the request of the accused or the defence counsels, to hold hearings in proceedings:
      • against detainees, except in cases of precautionary suspension of alternative measures, pursuant to Article 51 - ter of Law No. 354 of 26 July 1975;
      • in which precautionary or security measures have been applied;
      • for the application of preventive measures or in which preventive measures have been ordered.
    • A further exception is provided for proceedings having an urgent nature, due to the need to acquire non-deferrable evidence, in the cases referred to in Article 392 of the Italian Code of Criminal Procedure. The declaration of urgency shall be made by the judge or the Chairman of the panel, at the request of the party, by means of a reasoned and unappealable decision.

    N.B.: The extension of the suspension of deadlines and the postponement of hearings until 11 May 2020 shall not apply to proceedings in which the deadlines provided for by Article 304 of the Italian Code of Criminal Procedure expire in the six months following the date of 11 May 2020, pursuant to Article 36, paragraph 2, of Decree Law of 8 April 2020.

    Measures for judicial activity not subject to suspension or occurring after 12 May 2020:

    • With regard to judicial activity not subject to suspension and to the activity included in the period 12 May 2020 - 30 June 2020, the respective judicial offices may:
      • Restrict access to judicial offices
      • Limit opening hours to the public
      • Arrange a booking service to access the services
      • Adopt binding guidelines for the holding of hearings
      • Hold hearings in camera or remote hearings
    • With exclusive reference to the judicial activity included in the period from 12 May 2020 to 30 June 2020, the respective judicial offices may decide to further postpone hearings to a date after 30 June 2020, with the exception of those hearings mentioned in paragraph 3 of Article 83 Decree Law No. 18 of 17 March 2020. BY ORDER NO. 56/2020 DATED 10 APRIL, THE COURT OF MILAN ANNOUNCED ITS PREFERENCE FOR THIS APPROACH.

    Suspension of limitation periods and other deadlines:

    • In proceedings in which the suspension of time limits (until 11 May 2020) has been applied, the statute of limitations as well as the expiry of pre-trial detention deadlines are also suspended.
    • In the event of a further postponement of the hearing to a date after 30 June 2020:
      • the statute of limitations;
      • the expiry of the deadlines provided for in Articles 303 (maximum duration of pre-trial detention), 308 (maximum duration of other coercive/disqualifying measures), 309, paragraph 9 (deadline to decide on the request for review of coercive measures), 311, paragraphs 5 and 5-bis (30-day deadline for the decision of the Supreme Court and 10-day deadline for the referring court), 324, paragraph 7 (deadline for the decision of the court of review), of the Italian Code of Criminal Procedure;
      • the expiry of the deadlines provided for in Articles 24, paragraph 2 and 27, paragraph 6 of the Anti-Mafia Cod, with regard to confiscation

    will be suspended for said additional period, but in any case not later than 30 June.

    Measures for the participation in hearings of detained defendants:

    • Pursuant to Article 83, paragraph 12, of Legislative Decree No. 18 of 17 March 2020, participation in hearings by defendants detained, interned or remanded in custody will be ensured via videoconference or via remote connection, without prejudice to the application of Article 472, paragraph 3, of the Italian Code of Criminal Procedure.

    In addition to said tools, the DGSIA of the Ministry of Justice has also provided for the use of applications such as “TEAMS” and “SKYPE FOR BUSINESS”.

    In the case of hearings that can be held upon request, the Court of Milan has indicated that the request for the hearing to be held must be lodged by the accused or their defendants within 5 days before the date of the hearing in order to make arrangements for the remote participation of the accused.

    To avoid the risk of infection, hearings of oral arguments will be held in camera.

     

     

     

    This article is for information purposes only and is not, and cannot be intended as, a professional opinion on the topics dealt with. For further information please contact your counsel or send an email to Roberta Guaineri.